🎯 Master IELTS with Real Computer-Based Practice!
Prepare smarter with ieltsonestopcbt.com — India’s most trusted platform for IELTS Computer-Based Tests.
✅ Practice Reading and Listening in real exam format
✅ Instant results with detailed feedback
✅ Authentic test interface just like the official CBT exam
🚀 Start your free practice now at ieltsonestopcbt.com and experience the real IELTS test environment before your exam day
Some people say parents should not allow children to do activities which could be dangerous. Do you agree or disagree?
Sample Answer
Some people argue that parents should strictly prohibit children from engaging in activities that may pose a threat to their safety. Although this viewpoint stems from genuine concern, I strongly disagree with the idea of imposing absolute restrictions, as exposure to calculated risks is a crucial part of a child’s development.
Admittedly, parents have a moral obligation to safeguard their children from serious harm. Activities involving inadequate supervision or poor safety measures can result in long-term physical injuries or psychological trauma. From this perspective, enforcing safety guidelines and discouraging reckless behaviour are both reasonable and necessary. Without parental intervention, children may underestimate potential hazards and put themselves in vulnerable situations.
However, completely shielding children from risk can be detrimental in the long run. Participating in activities such as outdoor sports, cycling, or adventure-based learning allows children to build resilience, develop risk-assessment skills, and gain self-confidence. When risks are managed under adult supervision, children learn how to make informed decisions and cope with challenges independently. Excessive parental control, on the other hand, often leads to dependency and limits a child’s ability to navigate real-world situations.
In conclusion, while parents should take practical steps to minimise danger, banning all potentially risky activities is neither realistic nor beneficial. A balanced approach that combines safety awareness with controlled freedom is far more effective in fostering well-rounded and capable individuals.
High-Level Vocabulary
Strictly prohibit – formally forbid
Calculated risks – risks that are carefully considered
Moral obligation – a strong sense of duty
Psychological trauma – lasting emotional damage
Reckless behaviour – actions taken without thinking about consequences
Detrimental – harmful or damaging
Resilience – ability to recover from difficulties
Risk-assessment skills – ability to judge danger accurately
Informed decisions – choices made with proper understanding
Well-rounded individuals – people with balanced skills and qualities
High-Level Collocations
Pose a threat
Impose restrictions
Safeguard children
Enforce safety guidelines
Long-term consequences
Build resilience
Adult supervision
Excessive parental control
Navigate real-world situations
Balanced approach
No comments:
Post a Comment