Wednesday, 1 October 2025

Some people believe that paying workers according to what they sell or produce is the best way to motivate them to work harder. To what extent do you agree or disagree? Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience. | Real exam ielts writing task 2

Some people believe that paying workers according to what they sell or produce is the best way to motivate them to work harder.

To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.


✍️ Sample Answer

In the modern workplace, motivating employees to work harder is a major concern for organizations. Some argue that the most effective method is to pay workers based on how much they sell or produce. While I agree that performance-based pay can be a powerful incentive in certain industries, I believe that relying solely on this approach is not always the best solution.

On the one hand, linking pay directly to output can indeed encourage productivity. In sales or manufacturing, for example, employees who know their earnings depend on their performance are more likely to put in extra effort. This system also creates a sense of fairness, as workers who contribute more are rewarded more. For instance, sales representatives often earn commissions on each deal they close, which pushes them to achieve higher targets and ultimately benefits both the company and themselves.

On the other hand, paying only for results can lead to several drawbacks. First, it may create unhealthy competition among colleagues, reducing teamwork and cooperation. In fields like education or healthcare, where collaboration and long-term dedication are crucial, a pay-per-output system might undermine quality. Furthermore, employees may focus solely on quantity rather than quality, which could harm customer satisfaction. In addition, other motivational factors, such as job security, career growth, and recognition, play an equally significant role. For example, a teacher motivated by professional development opportunities and appreciation from students may perform better than one motivated solely by financial rewards.

In my opinion, a balanced approach works best. Companies should combine performance-related pay with fixed salaries and additional incentives such as training programs, promotions, and a positive work environment. This ensures that employees remain motivated not only by financial gain but also by long-term career prospects and job satisfaction.

In conclusion, while paying workers according to what they sell or produce can boost productivity in some sectors, it should not be seen as the only way to motivate staff. A comprehensive reward system that blends financial incentives with personal and professional growth opportunities is more effective in sustaining motivation.



No comments:

Post a Comment