Friday, 30 May 2025

Some people think that employers should not care about the way their employees dress, but the quality of their work. To what extent do you agree or disagree? | REAL EXAM IELTS WRITING TASK 2 NEW DELHI CBT |

📝 Question:

Some people think that employers should not care about the way their employees dress, but the quality of their work. To what extent do you agree or disagree?


Sample Answer

In today’s modern workplace, there is growing debate about whether appearance or performance should matter more. Some people argue that employers should focus solely on the quality of work their employees deliver rather than their dress code. I mostly agree with this view, although in some contexts, dressing appropriately still plays a meaningful role.

To begin with, the primary aim of any organization is productivity and achieving business goals. From this perspective, how an employee dresses has little to do with their competence, creativity, or results. For example, tech companies such as Google and Facebook promote a casual work environment where employees are encouraged to wear comfortable clothing. Despite the relaxed dress code, they continue to be some of the most successful and innovative companies in the world. This shows that talent, innovation, and results matter far more than outward appearance.

However, in certain industries, professional attire can still be important. For instance, in client-facing roles like banking, law, or hospitality, employees often serve as representatives of the brand. In such cases, a polished appearance helps build trust and maintain a company’s reputation. Dressing professionally also demonstrates respect for clients and company values, which can be just as crucial as job performance.

In my opinion, while appearance might still have a role in specific sectors, the emphasis should ultimately be placed on the quality of an employee’s contributions. As long as employees meet deadlines, produce excellent work, and uphold company standards, rigid dress codes can be relaxed without harming productivity.

To conclude, although appearance does matter in some industries, I strongly believe that the main focus of any employer should be the skills, results, and professionalism of their staff rather than their attire.


📚 Useful Vocabulary & Collocations

  • Client-facing roles

  • Dress code

  • Work performance

  • Professional appearance

  • Creative environment

  • Company image / brand reputation

  • Comfortable work culture

  • Respect for professionalism

  • Business objectives

  • Employee productivity



Thursday, 29 May 2025

Some people earn extremely high salaries compared to others. Some people think this is a good thing, while others believe that the government should fix a certain amount of salary. Discuss both views and give your opinion. | Real Exam ielts writing task 2

📝 Question:

Some people earn extremely high salaries compared to others. Some people think this is a good thing, while others believe that the government should fix a certain amount of salary. Discuss both views and give your opinion.


Sample Answer

It is often argued whether extremely high salaries should be allowed in society. While some people believe that earning a high income is beneficial for individuals and the economy, others think that governments should impose a maximum wage limit to reduce income inequality. This essay will discuss both perspectives before presenting my opinion.

Starting off with those who support high salaries, the main reason is that they serve as a reward for skill, talent, and hard work. In other words, people who invest years in education or take entrepreneurial risks should be allowed to earn according to their contribution and expertise. For example, top-level executives or scientists often make significant advancements that benefit society, and their high income reflects their value. Besides this, high-income earners pay a greater share of taxes, which can be used by the government to improve public services. Hence, many believe that allowing people to earn more can boost productivity and economic development.

On the other hand, some individuals argue that governments should impose a salary cap. The primary reason behind this is income inequality, which can lead to social unrest and feelings of injustice among the lower-income population. For instance, when CEOs earn hundreds of times more than ordinary workers, it may demotivate employees and widen the gap between the rich and the poor. Moreover, essential workers like teachers and nurses often receive modest salaries despite playing critical roles in society. Implementing a maximum wage limit could help redirect funds toward improving public sectors and ensuring fairer wealth distribution.

In my opinion, while it is important to address economic inequality, placing a strict limit on salaries may discourage innovation and ambition. Instead, governments should focus on progressive taxation and ensure fair wages for all sectors without punishing success.

To conclude, although setting a salary limit may reduce income inequality, I believe that high salaries should be allowed as long as governments ensure that wealth is fairly distributed and essential workers are adequately compensated.


Some people believe that newspapers are the best source of information to stay updated with current events, while others believe that they can get news from other media. Discuss both views and give your opinion. | REAL EXAM IELTS WRITING TASK 2 CBT

 Sure! Here's a Band 8+ IELTS Writing Task 2 sample answer for the May IELTS exam (CBT UAE) based on your request:


📝 Question:

Some people believe that newspapers are the best source of information to stay updated with current events, while others believe that they can get news from other media. Discuss both views and give your opinion.


💡 Ideas

✅ View 1: Newspapers are the best source

  • Reliable and verified information by trained journalists

  • Detailed and in-depth reporting with analysis

  • Traditional and distraction-free reading experience

✅ View 2: Other media is more effective

  • Instant access to news through apps and websites

  • Multimedia support: videos, live coverage, and infographics

  • Accessible anywhere, anytime using smartphones or devices


Sample Answer

It is often debated whether newspapers continue to be the most reliable way to stay informed about current events or if digital platforms have taken over that role. While some people argue that traditional newspapers offer more credible and detailed information, others believe that digital and electronic media are faster and more accessible. This essay will examine both perspectives before presenting my own opinion.

Starting off with those who support newspapers, the primary reason is the credibility of information they offer. In other words, articles in newspapers are written and edited by professional journalists and are carefully reviewed before publication. This ensures that the news is authentic and free from misinformation. Furthermore, newspapers often provide in-depth analysis of political, economic, and global events, helping readers to understand complex issues. For example, editorial columns and feature reports give background context that many fast-paced digital platforms often lack.

On the other hand, many individuals prefer modern media such as television, online news websites, and social media platforms due to their speed and convenience. With just a smartphone, people can access real-time updates from any part of the world. Moreover, the use of videos, interviews, and live coverage enhances understanding and engagement. Platforms like BBC News or Al Jazeera offer minute-by-minute updates, which are impossible with printed newspapers. Therefore, for people with busy lifestyles, digital media offers a much more practical solution.

In my opinion, while newspapers maintain their value for in-depth and accurate journalism, modern digital platforms are more effective in the current

Wednesday, 28 May 2025

As well as making money, businesses also have social responsibilities. To what extent do you agree or disagree? | REAL EXAM IELTS WRITING TASK 2 CBT |

As well as making money, businesses also have social responsibilities. To what extent do you agree or disagree?


💡 Ideas

✅ Agree (Social responsibility is important):

  • Environmental protection – Businesses contribute to pollution and should reduce carbon footprints.

  • Community development – Supporting local communities through donations, employment, and services.

  • Ethical practices – Fair wages, safe working conditions, and no exploitation.

❌ Disagree (Profit should be priority):

  • Economic survival – Small businesses may struggle financially and can't afford CSR activities.

  • Responsibility of government – Public welfare should be managed by governments, not companies.

  • Distraction from main goals – Focusing too much on social goals may reduce profitability.


📚 Vocabulary & Collocations

Phrase Use/Explanation
Corporate social responsibility A company's duty towards society
Ethical business practices Morally right behavior in business
Profit maximization Goal of earning the highest possible profit
Environmental sustainability Business actions that don’t harm the planet
Stakeholder interest Concerns of anyone affected by the company
Community engagement Involving local people in business activities
Reinvest in society Use profits to benefit the community

Sample Answer 

It is often argued that companies should not only focus on generating profit, but also bear responsibility towards society. I strongly agree with this view, as businesses operate within communities and should contribute to environmental and social well-being alongside their financial goals.

Starting off with the reasons for my agreement, the primary one is that businesses have a direct impact on the environment and society. In other words, most industries contribute to pollution and resource depletion; therefore, it is their moral obligation to adopt sustainable practices such as reducing emissions and recycling waste. For instance, many multinational corporations have started using renewable energy sources to lower their carbon footprints. Besides this, companies can support local communities by providing jobs, funding educational programs, or offering healthcare services. These actions not only uplift the underprivileged but also build a positive brand image for the business.

On the other hand, it can be argued that the main objective of a business is to generate revenue. While this is true to an extent, focusing solely on profit may lead to unethical practices such as underpaying employees or ignoring safety standards. If businesses reinvest part of their earnings into society, they not only gain long-term trust from stakeholders but also build a sustainable customer base. For example, companies like TATA in India are widely respected for balancing profitability with philanthropy and community welfare. Therefore, integrating social responsibility into business operations creates a win-win situation.

To conclude, I firmly believe that while profit is essential for any business, fulfilling social responsibilities is equally important. Ethical and community-focused practices not only benefit society but also lead to long-term success and reputation for companies.


The international community must act immediately to ensure all nations reduce the consumption of fossil fuel (gas and oil). To what extent do you agree or disagree? | REAL EXAM IELTS WRITING TASK 2 CBT HYDRABAD

 Question:

The international community must act immediately to ensure all nations reduce the consumption of fossil fuel (gas and oil).
To what extent do you agree or disagree?


💡 Ideas (Agree side):

  • Climate Change Control: Excessive use of fossil fuels is a major cause of global warming, sea level rise, and extreme weather events.

  • Sustainable Alternatives: Encouraging the use of renewable energy (solar, wind) can reduce dependency on gas and oil.

  • Global Unity Is Essential: Climate change knows no borders; all nations must contribute equally.

  • Example: Countries like Norway have made strong shifts toward green energy and set an example for others.


📚 Useful Vocabulary & Collocations:

Vocabulary / Phrase Meaning / Use
Fossil fuel consumption Use of non-renewable sources like coal, oil, gas
Global warming Rise in Earth’s average temperature
Carbon emissions Release of CO₂ into the atmosphere
Sustainable energy Energy from renewable sources
International cooperation Collaboration among countries
Environmental degradation Damage to the natural environment
Urgent action Immediate steps needed to solve a crisis
Clean energy transition Shift from fossil fuels to renewable energy

Sample Answer (Band 8+)

It is increasingly believed that the global community must urgently work together to reduce the consumption of fossil fuels such as gas and oil. I strongly agree with this notion, as the overuse of these non-renewable resources has led to severe environmental consequences and threatens the sustainability of future generations.

Starting off with the reasons for my agreement, the primary concern is the environmental damage caused by fossil fuel consumption. In other words, burning oil, coal, and gas releases a vast amount of carbon dioxide, which contributes to global warming and extreme weather patterns. If international leaders do not take immediate action, this could result in rising sea levels, food insecurity, and the loss of biodiversity. For example, the melting of polar ice caps in the Arctic is a direct result of increased global temperatures driven by carbon emissions. Hence, by reducing dependence on fossil fuels, nations can collectively slow down climate change and protect the environment.

Besides this, promoting clean energy alternatives such as solar, wind, and hydropower can benefit both the economy and public health. If the global community provides financial and technological support to developing countries, they will be better equipped to adopt sustainable energy. This transition will not only reduce pollution-related diseases but also generate green jobs. For instance, countries like Germany and Sweden have invested heavily in renewable energy and have become global leaders in innovation and sustainability. Therefore, international cooperation is key to ensuring a cleaner, safer, and more equitable future for all.

To conclude, I firmly believe that urgent, coordinated action by the global community is essential to reduce fossil fuel consumption. Such efforts will significantly mitigate the adverse effects of climate change and accelerate the shift towards a more sustainable and healthier planet.