📝 Writing Task 2 Question
Reducing working hours to six hours a day will benefit both individuals and society.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
✅ Sample Answer
In today's fast-paced and demanding world, maintaining a healthy work-life balance has become increasingly important. Some argue that limiting the workday to six hours would positively impact both individuals and society. I completely agree with this viewpoint, as it could lead to better mental health, improved efficiency, and a more sustainable economy.
Reducing the working day can significantly enhance people’s quality of life. With more free time, individuals are better able to focus on their personal well-being, spend time with loved ones, and pursue hobbies. For instance, Sweden has trialed shorter workdays and found that employees became less stressed and more motivated. In addition, a well-rested employee is likely to be more focused and productive during working hours, ultimately benefiting both the worker and the employer.
On a broader level, society also gains from reduced working hours. Overworked employees often suffer from mental and physical health issues, which places pressure on public healthcare systems. Shorter workdays may help reduce these problems. Moreover, with fewer working hours per person, companies may need to hire more employees to maintain output. This could create new job opportunities and reduce unemployment. As a result, the workforce becomes more balanced and socially inclusive.
In conclusion, transitioning to a six-hour workday provides a range of benefits for individuals and the wider society. It promotes better health, boosts workplace productivity, and encourages a more inclusive labour market. I strongly support this approach as a positive step toward a healthier, more efficient, and fairer working environment.
✅ Useful Vocabulary with Meanings
Word / Phrase | Meaning |
---|---|
Work-life balance | The balance between time spent at work and time spent on personal life |
Burnout | Physical or emotional exhaustion caused by long-term stress at work |
Productivity | The rate at which work is completed effectively and efficiently |
Overworked | Working too much, often leading to stress or poor health |
Efficiency | The ability to do something with minimal waste of time and resources |
Workforce | The total number of people employed in a particular company or country |
Mental well-being | A state of emotional and psychological health |
Sustainable economy | An economy that supports long-term growth without damaging resources |
Healthcare burden | Pressure or strain on the healthcare system due to public health issues |
Reduced hours policy | A work policy that limits daily working hours |
Job opportunities | Available positions for employment |
Flexible work schedule | A working timetable that allows variation in start and finish times |
Social inclusivity | Ensuring all groups in society have equal access and opportunity |
Labour market | The supply and demand for workers and jobs |
Trialed | Tested or experimented with something to see its effects |
✅ Collocations with Example Sentences
Collocation | Example Sentence |
---|---|
Improve quality of life | Shorter working hours can improve the overall quality of life for employees. |
Reduce stress levels | More personal time helps reduce stress levels among workers. |
Boost productivity | A well-rested worker can boost productivity significantly. |
Maintain work efficiency | Even with fewer hours, companies can maintain work efficiency through better focus. |
Create job opportunities | Hiring more staff to cover shorter shifts may create job opportunities. |
Positive impact on society | This policy could have a positive impact on society as a whole. |
Financial implications | Some businesses worry about the financial implications of hiring more workers. |
Global competitiveness | Critics argue that shorter workdays may reduce a country’s global competitiveness. |
No comments:
Post a Comment