Task Question:
Some countries achieve international sports success by building specialised facilities to train top athletes, instead of providing sports facilities that everyone can use. Do you think this is a positive or negative development?
🧠 Ideas to Use
✅ Why it is positive:
-
Helps nations perform better in global competitions (like Olympics).
-
Dedicated facilities ensure athletes get world-class training.
-
Brings national pride and inspires the next generation.
❌ Why it is negative:
-
Neglects grassroots participation in sports.
-
Widening gap between elite athletes and ordinary citizens.
-
Public money spent on facilities only a few can access.
🎯 My opinion:
-
While elite training is important, prioritising it over community facilities is a negative development as it discourages widespread participation and undermines public health.
Sample Answer:
In some countries, governments focus on building specialised facilities for elite athletes to achieve international sporting success, rather than investing in sports infrastructure for the general public. While this approach may yield short-term gains in global competitions, I believe it is a negative development in the long run as it neglects the wider benefits of sports for society.
On the one hand, specialised facilities play a crucial role in helping athletes compete at the highest level. Elite sports require world-class training centres, advanced equipment, and expert coaching, which cannot always be provided in community gyms or playgrounds. Countries that invest in such infrastructure often see impressive results in international events such as the Olympics, which boosts national pride and inspires young people to pursue sports professionally. For instance, nations like China and the United States have developed state-of-the-art facilities for their athletes, helping them dominate in global competitions.
On the other hand, prioritising elite sports over public access has significant drawbacks. Firstly, it limits ordinary citizens’ opportunities to engage in physical activity, which is essential for promoting public health and well-being. If governments fail to provide accessible sports facilities in local communities, it may discourage people from adopting active lifestyles, leading to long-term health issues like obesity and heart disease. Secondly, it creates inequality, as only a small number of athletes benefit from such investments, while the majority of taxpayers cannot access or use these expensive facilities.
In my opinion, while elite training centres are necessary for achieving international success, ignoring grassroots sports is a short-sighted policy. Governments should strike a balance by investing in both professional and public facilities to ensure that everyone has the opportunity to enjoy the benefits of physical activity, while still nurturing talent for competitive sports.
In conclusion, building specialised facilities for top athletes can enhance a country’s global sports performance, but neglecting community-level sports infrastructure is detrimental to public health and social equity. Therefore, I consider this trend to be a negative development overall.
📚 Vocabulary Used in the Essay:
-
specialised facilities
-
elite athletes
-
world-class training
-
national pride
-
grassroots sports
-
state-of-the-art
-
accessible sports facilities
-
physical activity
-
public health and well-being
-
social equity
-
nurturing talent
-
competitive sports
📝 Additional Vocabulary for Similar Topics:
-
recreational sports
-
professional versus amateur sports
-
community engagement
-
sports infrastructure
-
healthy lifestyle
-
athletic excellence
-
sports funding priorities
-
inclusive participation
-
public versus private investment
-
sports culture
No comments:
Post a Comment