Monday, 2 June 2025

For celebrities and other famous people, it is always good to be talked about in the media (e.g. Internet, newspapers, TV). Do you agree or disagree? | REAL EXAM IELTS WRITING TASK 2 |

Question:

For celebrities and other famous people, it is always good to be talked about in the media (e.g. Internet, newspapers, TV). Do you agree or disagree?


Sample Answer:

In today’s digital era, celebrities and public figures are constantly under the spotlight through various media platforms. While some argue that any publicity is beneficial for famous individuals, I believe that constant media attention is not always advantageous and can sometimes be harmful to their personal and professional lives.

On the one hand, media coverage can help celebrities remain relevant and maintain public interest. In the entertainment industry, being talked about in the media often translates into greater popularity, brand deals, and opportunities. For example, actors or influencers who trend on social media or appear in news headlines are more likely to secure high-paying endorsements or lead roles. In this sense, media attention plays a crucial role in building and sustaining a celebrity’s career.

However, I strongly believe that not all publicity is good publicity. Excessive or negative media coverage can damage a celebrity’s reputation and mental well-being. When the media invades their privacy or spreads false information, it can lead to public backlash, anxiety, and even depression. For instance, many well-known figures have spoken out about the emotional toll of being constantly judged or misrepresented by tabloids and online platforms. Moreover, being in the spotlight 24/7 often robs them of a normal life, making it difficult to maintain genuine relationships or peace of mind.

In conclusion, while media coverage can provide visibility and professional benefits to famous people, I believe that constant or negative attention can do more harm than good. It is important for the media to balance public interest with respect for individuals’ privacy and well-being.


Useful Vocabulary & Collocations:

  • Under the spotlight

  • Publicity and exposure

  • Endorsements and brand deals

  • Media coverage

  • Invade someone’s privacy

  • Public backlash

  • Emotional toll

  • Sustain a career

  • Reputational damage

  • Constant judgment



Sunday, 1 June 2025

The Thylacine | Real exam ielts reading | 31 may ielts reading

 

Reading Passage


The Thylacine

The extinct thylacine, also known as the Tasmanian tiger, was a marsupial that bore a superficial resemblance to a dog. Its most distinguishing feature was the 13-19 dark brown stripes over its back, beginning at the rear of the body and extending onto the tail. The thylacine’s average nose- to-tail length for adult males was 162.6 cm, compared to 153.7 cm for females.

The thylacine appeared to occupy most types of terrain except dense rainforest, with open eucalyptus forest thought to be its prime habitat. In terms of feeding, it was exclusively carnivorous, and its stomach was muscular with an ability to distend so that it could eat large amounts of food at one time, probably an adaptation to compensate for long periods when hunting was unsuccessful and food scarce. The thylacine was not a fast runner and probably caught its prey by exhausting it during a long pursuit. During long-distance chases, thylacines were likely to have relied more on scent than any other sense. They emerged to hunt during the evening, night and early morning and tended to retreat to the hills and forest for shelter during the day. Despite the common name ‘tiger’, the thylacine had a shy, nervous temperament. Although mainly nocturnal, it was sighted moving during the day and some individuals were even recorded basking in the sun.

The thylacine had an extended breeding season from winter to spring, with indications that some breeding took place throughout the year. The thylacine, like all marsupials, was tiny and hairless when born. New-borns crawled into the pouch on the belly of their mother, and attached themselves to one of the four teats, remaining there for up to three months. When old enough to leave the pouch, the young stayed in a lair such as a deep rocky cave, well-hidden nest or hollow log, whilst the mother hunted.

Approximately 4,000 years ago, the thylacine was widespread throughout New Guinea and most of mainland Australia, as well as the island of Tasmania. The most recent, well-dated occurrence of a thylacine on the mainland is a carbon-dated fossil from Murray Cave in Western Australia, which is around 3,100 years old. Its extinction coincided closely with the arrival of wild dogs called dingoes in Australia and a similar predator in New Guinea. Dingoes never reached Tasmania, and most scientists see this as the main reason for the thylacine’s survival there.

The dramatic decline of the thylacine in Tasmania, which began in the 1830s and continued for a century, is generally attributed to the relentless efforts of sheep farmers and bounty hunters with shotguns. While this determined campaign undoubtedly played a large part, it is likely that various other factors also contributed to the decline and eventual extinction of the species. These include competition with wild dogs introduced by European settlers, loss of habitat along with the disappearance of prey species, and a distemper-like disease which may also have affected the thylacine.

There was only one successful attempt to breed a thylacine in captivity, at Melbourne Zoo in 1899. This was despite the large numbers that went through some zoos, particularly London Zoo and Tasmania’s Hobart Zoo. The famous naturalist John Gould foresaw the thylacine’s demise when he published his Mammals of Australia between 1848 and 1863, writing, ‘The numbers of this singular animal will speedily diminish, extermination will have its full . way, and it will then, like the wolf of England and Scotland, be recorded as an animal of the past.’

However, there seems to have been little public pressure to preserve the thylacine, nor was much concern expressed by scientists at the decline of this species in the decades that followed. A notable exception was T.T. Flynn, Professor of Biology at the University of Tasmania. In 1914, he was sufficiently concerned about the scarcity of the thylacine to suggest that some should be captured and placed on a small island. But it was not until 1929, with the species on the very edge of extinction, that Tasmania’s Animals and Birds Protection Board passed a motion protecting thylacines only for the month of December, which was thought to be their prime breeding season. The last known wild thylacine to be killed was shot by a farmer in the north-east of Tasmania in 1930, leaving just captive specimens. Official protection of the species by the Tasmanian government was introduced in July 193′, 59 days before the last known individual died in Hobart Zoo on 7th September, 1936.

There have been numerous expeditions and searches for the thylacine over the years, none of which has produced definitive evidence that thylacines still exist. The species was declared extinct by the Tasmanian government in 1986.

Questions 1-5

Complete the notes below.
Choose ONE WORD ONLY from the passage for each answer.

The thylacine

Appearance and behaviour

·         Looked rather like a dog

·         Had a series of stripes along its body and tail

·         Ate an entirely 1 ……………… diet

·         Probably depended mainly on 2 ………………. when hunting

·         Young spent the first months of life inside its mother’s 3 …………………..

Decline and extinction

·         Last evidence in mainland Australia is a 3100-year-old 4 ………………

·         Probably went extinct in mainland Australia due to animals known as dingoes

·         Reduction in 5 ………………. and available sources of food were partly responsible for the decline in Tasmania

Questions 6-13

Do the following statements agree with the information given in the Reading Passage? In boxes 6-13 on your answer sheet, write
TRUE if the statement agrees with the information
FALSE if the statement contradicts the information
NOT GIVEN if there is no information on this

6. Significant numbers of thylacines were killed by humans from the 1830s onwards.

7. Several thylacines were born in zoos during the late 1800s.

8. John Gould’s prediction about thylacine surprised some biologists.

9. In the early 1900s, many scientists became worried about the possible extinction of the thylacine.

10. T. T. Flynn’s proposal to rehome captive thylacines on an island proved to be impractical.

11. There were still reasonable numbers of thylacines in existence when a piece of legislation protecting the species during their breeding season was passed.

12. From 1930 to 1936, the only known living thylacines were all in captivity.

13. Attempts to find living thylacine’ are now rarely made.

 


ANSWERS:

1.
Carnivorous
2. Scent
3. Pouch 
4. Fossil
5. Habitat
6. True 
7. False 
8. Not given 
9. False 
10. Not given 
11. False 
12. True 
13. Not given 



Password:  31MAY2025

 

Friday, 30 May 2025

Some people think that employers should not care about the way their employees dress, but the quality of their work. To what extent do you agree or disagree? | REAL EXAM IELTS WRITING TASK 2 NEW DELHI CBT |

📝 Question:

Some people think that employers should not care about the way their employees dress, but the quality of their work. To what extent do you agree or disagree?


Sample Answer

In today’s modern workplace, there is growing debate about whether appearance or performance should matter more. Some people argue that employers should focus solely on the quality of work their employees deliver rather than their dress code. I mostly agree with this view, although in some contexts, dressing appropriately still plays a meaningful role.

To begin with, the primary aim of any organization is productivity and achieving business goals. From this perspective, how an employee dresses has little to do with their competence, creativity, or results. For example, tech companies such as Google and Facebook promote a casual work environment where employees are encouraged to wear comfortable clothing. Despite the relaxed dress code, they continue to be some of the most successful and innovative companies in the world. This shows that talent, innovation, and results matter far more than outward appearance.

However, in certain industries, professional attire can still be important. For instance, in client-facing roles like banking, law, or hospitality, employees often serve as representatives of the brand. In such cases, a polished appearance helps build trust and maintain a company’s reputation. Dressing professionally also demonstrates respect for clients and company values, which can be just as crucial as job performance.

In my opinion, while appearance might still have a role in specific sectors, the emphasis should ultimately be placed on the quality of an employee’s contributions. As long as employees meet deadlines, produce excellent work, and uphold company standards, rigid dress codes can be relaxed without harming productivity.

To conclude, although appearance does matter in some industries, I strongly believe that the main focus of any employer should be the skills, results, and professionalism of their staff rather than their attire.


📚 Useful Vocabulary & Collocations

  • Client-facing roles

  • Dress code

  • Work performance

  • Professional appearance

  • Creative environment

  • Company image / brand reputation

  • Comfortable work culture

  • Respect for professionalism

  • Business objectives

  • Employee productivity



Thursday, 29 May 2025

Some people earn extremely high salaries compared to others. Some people think this is a good thing, while others believe that the government should fix a certain amount of salary. Discuss both views and give your opinion. | Real Exam ielts writing task 2

📝 Question:

Some people earn extremely high salaries compared to others. Some people think this is a good thing, while others believe that the government should fix a certain amount of salary. Discuss both views and give your opinion.


Sample Answer

It is often argued whether extremely high salaries should be allowed in society. While some people believe that earning a high income is beneficial for individuals and the economy, others think that governments should impose a maximum wage limit to reduce income inequality. This essay will discuss both perspectives before presenting my opinion.

Starting off with those who support high salaries, the main reason is that they serve as a reward for skill, talent, and hard work. In other words, people who invest years in education or take entrepreneurial risks should be allowed to earn according to their contribution and expertise. For example, top-level executives or scientists often make significant advancements that benefit society, and their high income reflects their value. Besides this, high-income earners pay a greater share of taxes, which can be used by the government to improve public services. Hence, many believe that allowing people to earn more can boost productivity and economic development.

On the other hand, some individuals argue that governments should impose a salary cap. The primary reason behind this is income inequality, which can lead to social unrest and feelings of injustice among the lower-income population. For instance, when CEOs earn hundreds of times more than ordinary workers, it may demotivate employees and widen the gap between the rich and the poor. Moreover, essential workers like teachers and nurses often receive modest salaries despite playing critical roles in society. Implementing a maximum wage limit could help redirect funds toward improving public sectors and ensuring fairer wealth distribution.

In my opinion, while it is important to address economic inequality, placing a strict limit on salaries may discourage innovation and ambition. Instead, governments should focus on progressive taxation and ensure fair wages for all sectors without punishing success.

To conclude, although setting a salary limit may reduce income inequality, I believe that high salaries should be allowed as long as governments ensure that wealth is fairly distributed and essential workers are adequately compensated.


Some people believe that newspapers are the best source of information to stay updated with current events, while others believe that they can get news from other media. Discuss both views and give your opinion. | REAL EXAM IELTS WRITING TASK 2 CBT

 Sure! Here's a Band 8+ IELTS Writing Task 2 sample answer for the May IELTS exam (CBT UAE) based on your request:


📝 Question:

Some people believe that newspapers are the best source of information to stay updated with current events, while others believe that they can get news from other media. Discuss both views and give your opinion.


💡 Ideas

✅ View 1: Newspapers are the best source

  • Reliable and verified information by trained journalists

  • Detailed and in-depth reporting with analysis

  • Traditional and distraction-free reading experience

✅ View 2: Other media is more effective

  • Instant access to news through apps and websites

  • Multimedia support: videos, live coverage, and infographics

  • Accessible anywhere, anytime using smartphones or devices


Sample Answer

It is often debated whether newspapers continue to be the most reliable way to stay informed about current events or if digital platforms have taken over that role. While some people argue that traditional newspapers offer more credible and detailed information, others believe that digital and electronic media are faster and more accessible. This essay will examine both perspectives before presenting my own opinion.

Starting off with those who support newspapers, the primary reason is the credibility of information they offer. In other words, articles in newspapers are written and edited by professional journalists and are carefully reviewed before publication. This ensures that the news is authentic and free from misinformation. Furthermore, newspapers often provide in-depth analysis of political, economic, and global events, helping readers to understand complex issues. For example, editorial columns and feature reports give background context that many fast-paced digital platforms often lack.

On the other hand, many individuals prefer modern media such as television, online news websites, and social media platforms due to their speed and convenience. With just a smartphone, people can access real-time updates from any part of the world. Moreover, the use of videos, interviews, and live coverage enhances understanding and engagement. Platforms like BBC News or Al Jazeera offer minute-by-minute updates, which are impossible with printed newspapers. Therefore, for people with busy lifestyles, digital media offers a much more practical solution.

In my opinion, while newspapers maintain their value for in-depth and accurate journalism, modern digital platforms are more effective in the current